Search for: "MATTER OF M J S" Results 4641 - 4660 of 4,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
And, if necessary, the trial court then can determine whether it is in M's best interests to retain the existing custody arrangement, whether other conditions should be imposed on father's continued custody of M, or change custody from father to mother.In other words,when it comes to circumcision of a boy at age 12, don't just ask a doctor or a religious leader - ask the child, too. - Garry J. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
"  135 N.E.2d at 754 (Desmond, J., dissenting). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:12 am
NMCCA 200501051 (N-M. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 12:13 pm
His J'Accuse represents not only a thorough demolition of the details of the contract but the LSC's approach to getting barristers to sign. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Paul M. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
  Furthermore, the Board found that even should its exercise of jurisdiction put the Board at cross purposes with the New Jersey statute, the Board's exercise of jurisdiction was nevertheless valid under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
What really matters is the merits of the suit. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
It was a family law matter. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
The district court properly held that as a matter of law, Cyclone's interference with the City's contract with Western was improper. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
The district court properly held that as a matter of law, Cyclone's interference with the City's contract with Western was improper. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 5:23 pm
But now "doing" is something I've had enough of, after two years of doing it and doing it and doing it well (Thanks LL Cool J) and I'm ready to start thinking again. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 10:02 pm
Here are ten of my personal favorites from the 2007 Legal Theory Bookworm:Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework by David M. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
The Court’s opinion was explicitly direct, and its ruling simple. [read post]