Search for: "Matter of Novel"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 7,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 9:23 am
The U.S. emphasizes the information and promotion functions of the NCP, and it tends to narrow the emphasis of its specific instance jurisdiction as only a species of its core mission to work with interested parties.Governments adhering to the Guidelines each have a National Contact Point (NCP), whose main functions are to: (1) promote awareness of the Guidelines to business, civil society, and the general public; and (2) work with business, civil society and the public on all matters… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
Justices of the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals just had the opportunity to weigh in on the matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
First, what is claimed is a composition of matter, a molecule, that can be described by its sequence but is not the same as that sequence. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
For any given invention, the inquiry is simple: does it fit in one or more categories: process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter? [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:43 am
This is true for plan documents, LTD policies, and essentially any contract – words and anticipation aren’t always enough to create a document that fully provides for everything that might happen in the future, leaving the parties to dispute how the document applies when a novel event eventually occurs. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
This app has a novel take on flight and hotel planning – it shows all the relevant flights on a timeline, helping you to visualize the right choice. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board found claim 1 to be novel. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
A casual reader could mistake this sentence for the introduction to an interesting novel, but IP attorneys will certainly remember that these words spell another chapter of the Apple v Samsung saga, on which Merpel reported here. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm
This prediction has so far been validated.Now let's look at the Tuesday rulings on an item-by-item basis.Ruling on Samsung's motion for judgment as a matter of lawThe most important part of this JMOL ruling is that Judge Koh, unlike the jury, did not find a willful patent infringement by Samsung. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It follows therefrom that the common concept defined in paragraph [2.2] above is not novel in the light of document D2. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
Although only the second argument is discussed in the CAFC opinion, Rexnord raised two arguments in response: (1) both Palmaer and Thompson disclosed a completely closed space (i.e.: a space with a diameter of 0 mm) and (2) Thompson, Jr. et al. goes beyond merely disclosing a closed space in a preferred embodiment, and teaches the exact subject matter that Habasit asserts is novel in the '680 Patent. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:59 pm
Lowney in this matter. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
Nonsense, says Aereo, and points to its novel antenna system to say the TV beaming is not a public performance at all. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:37 am
However, either of both parties objected, either or both could bring the matter to the court for review. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
[6] Some may argue that this sort of complexity in law may not be peculiar only to the intellectual property right laws, however, it is evident that this set of law is one of the most technical both in relation to law and subject matter.[7] Some experts are of the view that, intellectual property right laws are more ‘taxing’ than tax statutes.[8] Not only is the law difficult to understand but also expensive. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
The case also raises a novel argument for secondary indicia of nonobviousness. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:33 am
And under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a court must quash a subpoena if it requires disclosure of protected matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Ryan 2013 SCC 3[1] This appeal raises a novel question: may a wife, whose life is threatened by her abusive husband, rely on the defence of duress when she tries to have him murdered? [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:59 am
Merpel wonders what is the patent wording currently in force in the UK, and also looks forward to the EPO Appeal, which still has scope to change matters. [read post]
