Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
The apportionment question came up in Oracle v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:00 pm
Citibank, N.A. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:45 pm
Its stock price soared by almost 20%. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:18 am
Created under New Rule 610T of Regulation NMS, the pilot subjects exchange transaction-fee pricing, including "maker-taker" fee-and-rebate pricing models, to new temporary pricing restrictions across three test groups. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm
If the Govt. goes in for price regulation of patented medicines and fixes a price, then it is no longer possible to issue Compulsory License on the ground of reasonableness of the price. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
SemiLEDs’ stock price fell nearly 11% on July 12, 2011 The announcement and stock price decline took place two years ago, but the plaintiffs did not file their complaint until July 10, 2013. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 am
Concordia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:29 am
Harkening back to those childhood days, I always wanted to see The Price is Right live. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The panel accordingly concluded that the denial of Grayscale's proposal was arbitrary and capricious because the Commission failed to explain its different treatment of similar products, the panel concluded (Grayscale Investments, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:25 pm
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:41 am
" Amoco v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:13 am
Unlike the mother in Blackwell v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm
Plaintiff contends that the arbitration provision only applies to disputes between him and Instacart, whereas Ralph contends that this provision applies to "any dispute" (including those with Ralphs) that "arise[s] out of or relate[s] to . . . any transactions through [Instacart] or . . . any goods or services purchased [] through Instacart," which these (allegedly) were since the dispute definitely involves the (allegedly false) price paid for the goods purchased… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
Defendant reversed the portion of the purchase price paid by credit card and attempted to refund the cash balance. [read post]
