Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 4641 - 4660 of 6,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
  And they will believe that it is possible that the same may not be true by the time another nomination rolls around in later years. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
On 29 July 2001 judgment will be given in Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 by the Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,392,917 entitled ROLL OF DISPOSABLE PIECES OF HYGIENIC PAPER and owned by Gideon Sasonoff and Yaron Inbal. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,392,917 entitled ROLL OF DISPOSABLE PIECES OF HYGIENIC PAPER and owned by Gideon Sasonoff and Yaron Inbal. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
   Although he was successful before Mr Justice Eady (His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group ([2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)), the Court of Appeal have given permission to appeal and the matter is listed before the Master of the Rolls, Sedley and Hooper LJJ on 28 February or 1 March 2011. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 20-21 January… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Mentioning cases in which he said Strasbourg had rejected the balance of policy interests struck by British courts – S & Marper v UK and Gillan & Quinton v UK – he said British judges should be more assertive, or else they should not be surprised to find themselves rolled over with increasing regularity. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:00 am
Perhaps your insurance company should be paying for the damages and your counsel (soon to be decided in Builders Mutual v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]