Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 4641 - 4660 of 41,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
The Court also proclaims clearly that all states parties to the Geneva Conventions, including the relevant states of nationality, must ensure that those authorities comply with Common Article 3, by doing everything “reasonably within their power” to put an end to violations of international humanitarian law prohibiting humiliating or degrading treatment. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Aaron R. Cooper
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm by Unknown
United States (Trust Relationship; Mineral Leasing) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Ahtna, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As such, any statute authorizing state, local, or D.C. regulation of such questions requires a clear statement from Congress delegating that power. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Still, the Ukrainian example is powerful: why shouldn’t a similarly disposed country have something like the second amendment? [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Abstract: While the Supreme Court regularly decides cases defining the limits of the criminal jurisdiction of tribal courts, when it heard United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In the Court’s June 30, 2022 opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Florian Mueller
We're way past the point at which Apple's abuse of its market power is merely a problem affecting "competitors" or a few consumers. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm by Aimee Brown
The second case this week is United Power, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm by Reference Staff
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]