Search for: "STATE v DAVIS"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 5,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
7001199 FIRST P PEI 7001103 BALL 7001021 BALL 7001020 BALL 7001019 BALL 7001018 BALL 7000965 6994585 INDIANA STATE 6997879 PAUSE 6998211 WORLD JOURNAL FOR SAND THERAPY PRACTICE 6998210 WORLD ASSOCIATION OF SAND THERAPY PROFESSIONALS 6997876 STANDARD BARBERS 6994569 EZ-FLATS 6994557 GODDESS MOUNTAIN NATURALS 6994471 PRIMAL OFF ROAD 6997633 PROJECT: JAYBIRD 7012834 AUBURN 7012793 FUSION POINT CONSORTIUM 7002865 REACTIVE 7000741 SIMPLE GARDEN 6994063 PITOTSHIELD 7000672 Z-LITE [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The first, Wilmington Savings v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:02 am
v=dyoBP8dDG7s [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:13 pm
The New Jersey State Federation of Women’s Clubs, Scenic Hudson Inc., Margo Moss, and Jakob Franke (the intervenors), Carol Jacoby, and Marcia Davis, appealed from an August 9, 2013 order upholding defendant Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Englewood Cliffs’ site plan approval and grant of height and bulk variances to defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:34 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am
If the victim does not wish to testify the government will attempt to admit the 911 calls into evidence, pursuant to case law from the United States Supreme Court, that that allows statements made to a 911 operator to come into evidence without the defendant being given the opportunity to cross-examine the victim under a case known as Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
Contact for submission and inquiries: Professor Erin Buzuvis Western New England University School of Law ebuzuvis@law.wne.edu 413-782-1405 _______ [1] Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Earlier this year in Sabow v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Whiting v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 10:47 pm
Goldstein v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will enforce the appeal waiver in all… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:43 am
Now the court looks at whether the allegations state a claim for 12(b)(6) purposes. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Doyle v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:33 am
For example, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA), in Walsh/Davis Joint Venture v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
And, more important, the United States Supreme Court agrees with me. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Doyle v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
A legal challenge to S.1 of DRIPA by MPs David Davis and Tom Watson is under way. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:11 am
[Davis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The reversal in course in California v. [read post]
