Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 21,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
GuestKat Alex Woolgar reports on a decision concerning the law on trade mark exhaustion in That was exhausting: sale of individual bracelet link infringes trade mark. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm
But within state-licensed cannabis dispensaries, the California Department of Public Health allows the sale of CBD products if the CBD is derived from cannabis or marijuana plants but not if derived from industrial hemp. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:52 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision in Lucia v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Lone Star Promotions v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:17 am
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:52 am
§ 207. ⁱⁱⁱ Sullivan v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
It’s just disingenuous at best in endorsing a distinction between nondigital and digital copies that does not make sense of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “origin,” especially in light of the Office’s (correct) position in discussions of first sale that a digital copy stored on a computer is a reproduction. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
But the case brings the most direct legal challenge in the United States to the clout that Apple has built up through its App Store. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm
(Kraft packaging pre-sale) Kraft sold its Australian peanut butter business and various assets to Bega in 2017 (note it was not a share sale). [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm
(Kraft packaging pre-sale) Kraft sold its Australian peanut butter business and various assets to Bega in 2017 (note it was not a share sale). [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm
The SJC, Massachusetts’ highest court, issued its long awaited decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:41 pm
According to the investigators, however, most of the marketing activities for the distribution and sale of the GUCCI products actually took place at the premises of the Italian company in Milan. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
In Tracy v. [read post]
