Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 3:28 pm
Supreme Court Upholds DACA for Now On June 18, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in DHS v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:39 pm
Tuesday, a panel of the 9th Circuit issued its opinion in Deere v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
New York, unlike other states (such as California), does not grant divorces based on irreconcilable differences. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:17 am
I argue that, textually, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Emboldened by the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946), the United States Supreme Court held, "it is only when an employee is required to give up a substantial measure of his time and effort that compensable working time (which is covered by the FLSA) is involved" In Lindow v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
United Debt Holdings, LLC (Debt Collection; Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlState in Interest of M.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
Unable to show “coercion” of their religious beliefs, the Indian plaintiffs could not rely on the First Amendment to protect their interests in aboriginal territory now owned by the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
Several news outlets have reports on Marder v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:33 am
This statement allegedly violates California law because more than ten percent of the condoms’ wholesale value allegedly derives from natural latex material produced outside of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California still didn't necessarily have to stay the related infringement claims. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:47 am
On March 6, 2020, a Central District Court in UPL NA Inc. f/k/a United Phosphorous, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Pa- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:08 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
