Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 4641 - 4660 of 37,716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The new proclamation applies to the entry into the United States of all noncitizen nonimmigrants (noncitizens who are visiting the United States or otherwise being admitted temporarily) traveling to the United States by air. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:49 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
These two provisions currently state that judges can not sentence an offender to a CSO if: the offence has a maximum prison term of 14 years or life (s. 742.1(c)); orif the offence involved the import, export, trafficking or production of drugs (s. 762.1(e)(ii)).Therefore, because of this recent court decision, in Ontario a judge can consider a CSO even if the offence committed has a maximum sentence of 14 years, or if it involved importing,… [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
That level of severity is typical; North Dakota’s law criminalizes the “intentional interruption” of a critical infrastructure facility (which extends to interfering with pipeline construction) as a Class C felony, punishable by a maximum of five years in prison and a fine of $10,000. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
By comparing and contrasting United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:08 pm by Phil Waters
Department of Health and Human Service’s initiative known as Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
” This concept may seem sufficiently broad to allow most plaintiffs’ lawyers recovery of fees, but it certainly does not have that valence after the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Home Care v. [read post]