Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 4641 - 4660 of 6,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by Richard D. Friedman
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am by admin
Davis-Stirling states a 30-90 day window prior to the start of the fiscal year. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
Here's a possibility: The Utah Supreme Court's ruling today in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
Applying the standards from Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Barbara Moreno
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]