Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
The first 2 posts covered copyright and trade marks.As previously stated, the Africa IP Highlights 2022 is the result of collaboration between myself and and Doreen Adoma Agyei and Clarisse Mideva. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Today the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑583/12 Sintax [or, if you prefer, Syntax: the CJEU uses both spellings] Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Estonia's Riigikohus. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:08 am
This approach is entirely at odds with current Spanish jurisprudence – in particular the decision in Audiencia Nacional of Quedelibros v SGAE (decision here; discussed here, both in Spanish) which stated that it is against the law to treat these intermediaries as autonomous infringers without taking into account the status of the owner of the website who hosts the material. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
The Federal Circuit tempered this holding by citing to Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:30 am
The defendant in New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:58 am
We made the filing in Latif v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
EU GI rights will still need to be litigated separately in each EU Member State. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 11:06 am
The Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
The amendment establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of the right-holder as long as its name/pseudonym appears linked to the communication of the work to the public, which Microsoft was able to prove. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 3:28 am
Instagram, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 9:54 am
The public interest must come before the loud voices of patent trolls and a few powerful patent holders. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
One such case is Swedenburg v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
