Search for: "State v. Liberator" Results 4641 - 4660 of 7,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
You should submit evidence under at least 1 of the 5 criteria listed in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D)(5)(i)-(v): (i) Recognition of expertise by at least two recognized authorities in the same specialty occupation; (ii) Membership in a recognized association or society in the specialty occupation; (iii) Published material by or about the alien in the professional publications, trade journals, books, or major newspapers; (iv) Licensure or registration to practice the specialty occupation in a… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:41 am by Maya Angenot
Well, for one, it is so obvious that the Charter of Values infringes freedom of conscience and religion under section 2(a) of the Canadian Charter, as it was most famously described by Chief Justice Dickson in R. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:42 am by Jeff Redding
—situated in the midst of an Eero Saarinen, a Philip Johnson, and a Richard Serra (clockwise), and rendered less as an ally of governmental power, than a friend of the liberal arts—if not an art-piece itself. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” This suggests a broad and liberal interpretation of Section 230. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
John adds that Mr Brandis has stated that the new Government will wait until the post-implementation review of the ARR scheme is complete before it does anything. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Lurking through cases that offered heightened scrutiny outside the normal tiered rubric was a lingering fear of the spirit Lochner, in this body Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm by Venkat
Johnson County CCSending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:30 pm by David Bernstein
As a liberal he seems to have instinctually favored free speech. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]