Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
Contrary to Respondents’ suggestion, the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
Clark v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:32 am
"Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
"To this end, a medical opinion on the issue of causation must signify a probability as to the underlying cause of the claimant's injury which is supported by a rational basis" (Matter of Mayette v Village of Massena Fire Dept., 49 AD3d 920, 922 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Lichten v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
"To this end, a medical opinion on the issue of causation must signify a probability as to the underlying cause of the claimant's injury which is supported by a rational basis" (Matter of Mayette v Village of Massena Fire Dept., 49 AD3d 920, 922 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Lichten v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Commentary on Lockhart v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:36 am
Articles 28 and 30 EC and abuse of rights Article 28 of the EC Treaty prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports between member states and all measures having equivalent effect. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Tolliver v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
The Ninth Circuit held that this was incorrect in light of the California Supreme Court's decision in Marks v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
I also enjoyed reading Margaret Chon's recent book chapter, Certification and Collective Marks in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:33 am
Blockchain Luxembourg S.A. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 1:14 pm
Custom Vehicles, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
“Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain false advertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In Matal v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
