Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 13,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 6:33 am
Paragraphs [793] and [794] state: "The relevant patents have been found valid and infringed. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Although the state law was modeled on the since-repealed federal law, unlike the latter, the state law does not include a definition of “surcharge” making clear that it only limits how prices are communicated. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
(C-62/86 AKZO Chemie v Commission [1991] ECR I-3359). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
This article explains why the price of repeating arms declined so steeply. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am
The Second Circuit sucked some of the wind out of those sails in Christiansen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:49 pm
Empire Storage v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Rest Easy (or Easier), Low-level Computer Technicians In United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
I think that neither the merchants nor the card networks will be jubilant about the Supreme Court’s narrow decision yesterday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
In a recent non-precedential decision in the case of Adams v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
In that sense, it is the government that lacks mutuality; it can indict with a reasonable assurance—[but certainly not a guarantee]—that the defendant will not be able/willing to pay the stiff price of appearing in the U.S. to challenge the indictment. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
The decided case was Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:22 am
“It would risk increased prices and unforeseeable disruption in the clothing industry, which in the United States alone encompasses nearly $370 billion in annual spending and 1.8 million jobs. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:25 am
States have at times tried to restrict such labeling, but BellSouth Tellecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:17 am
The Supreme Court ruled today in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:46 am
Runyon and Dawson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:49 am
Martin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
He complained at length about the supermarket down the street that sold mostly groceries, but also household items at discounted prices. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
