Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 4641 - 4660 of 4,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2007, 1:41 am
Why protect TM owners from this behavior in particular? [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
Because the statements identified by DirectBuy are pure opinion, they are protected by the First Amendment and can't give rise to liability for defamation. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
It ends up being more difficult to show nominative fair use than to show lack of confusion. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
A paper from another panel:Eric Claeys, George Mason University School of LawINS v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Many insightful comments, including a defense of laissez-faire (which I don't think can be coherent because once you allow common-law protection against fraud into your laissez-faire state we are merely debating what counts as fraud - consumer protection is at least in one popular form about promoting autonomy). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:23 am
Freecycle Network, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
Instead of civil detention, we ought to make sure...these pedophiles...are locked up forever. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
” The Index was released today by the HRC as part of a report showing that a record number of the largest U.S. companies are expanding benefits and protections for their GLBT employees and consumers. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 1:57 pm
The issues were whether the "technical" standards of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C.A. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Even those who don't are exposed to a wide variety of marketing efforts, some of which they respond to more than others. [read post]