Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 11,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 5:09 am
And the allegation that an “image of nature” could be viewed as deceptively describing the ingredients in granola bars was entirely implausible, and therefore inadequate to state a claim for anything. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:15 pm
” See “State Bar of Nevada Study Committee on Lawyer Advertising. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:27 pm
State Bar Assoc. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
California Teachers Association and Janus v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:58 am
This Survey covers cases decided by American state and federal appellate courts from January 1 to December 31, 2013, and posted on Westlaw by midnight, December 31, 2013. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
The district court granted the petition because of a Cunningham violation, but the state appealed, arguing that Cunningham was a new constitutional principle. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
Treading gingerly into the minefield of Tobacco II, the Court said: But the Tobacco II court did not state or suggest there are no substantive limits on absent class members seeking restitution when a defendant has engaged in an alleged unlawful or unfair business practice. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 7:53 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, Sept. 20, 2019, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:55 pm
(emphasis added) The court ruled that this is a legal question that was not present in the Chin litigation, and therefore was not barred under the collateral estoppel doctrine. 2. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
The FDCA bars states from imposing new or additional labeling “requirements,” “but is silent with regards to states’ ability to provide remedies for violations of federal law. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:54 pm
The High Bar to Harm While there are exceptions, too often courts dismiss data breach lawsuits based on a cramped view of what constitutes “harm. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:50 am
A federal law, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, bars most lawsuits against foreign states and their agencies unless one of several exceptions to the act applies. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:34 am
In dismissing plaintiff’s claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law, the court stated “If a reasonable consumer was concerned about sugar content, he or she can see how much sugar is in a Wallaby product. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:31 am
Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008), the state Supreme Court ruled that the city of Kalamazoo could not extend benefits to the qualified domestic partners of city employees.Kalamazoo voters have just adopted a law that bars discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodation on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:34 am
Interestingly, a court in California had rejected this same kind of pure foreseeability doctrine in O'Neil v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am
If a foreign defendant has assets in the United States and a U.S. judgment can be enforced in the United States, bypassing The Hague Convention does not matter. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Or from states that bar Texas products on social grounds? [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 2:57 am
FIRE has won in court in similar cases. [read post]
