Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 2:57 pm
ETWHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit livestream:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC78NfBf28AQe3x7-SbbMC2AFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/uniloc-v-apple Contact: AaronMackeySenior Staff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
Applying the framework from the recent en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Ben Golant, the Copyright Office’s assistant general counsel, asked whether AT&T, the exclusive provider for the iPhone in the United States, “prohibits you from implementing certain applications? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am
Image via Wikipedia Here are the latest United States Supreme Court Opinions with the new Justices. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
In 2011, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) and Organization United for Respect at Walmart (OUR Walmart) began organizing and conducting demonstrations at Walmart stores across the country, including California. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
" The Court focused on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in the ruling this month, a bill that extends the time period in which employees can pursue equal compensation lawsuits, and restores the law that existed for years in regions all over the United States, including Southern California, prior to the Ledbetter v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 am
District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed the antitrust claims in Rock River Communications Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
On April 16, 2008, a California Appellate Court decided Bradstreet v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:34 pm
In Roth v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
On April 1, 2011, in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am
If a foreign defendant has assets in the United States and a U.S. judgment can be enforced in the United States, bypassing The Hague Convention does not matter. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
Plaintiff went on to graduate from high school and enlist in the United States Marine Corps in 2005. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:53 pm
Barnes is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:01 pm
The Court found, in a 2-1 decision, that in 2020, the United States District Court for California, Southern District (San Diego) had abused its discretion when it enjoined the State of California from enforcing AB-5 against motor carriers doing business in California (on the ground that such enforcement was preempted by F4A) (our prior article on the District Court’s ruling can be read here). [read post]
