Search for: "V-lawyer" Results 4641 - 4660 of 74,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2013, 11:31 pm
The tide has somewhat turned as a result of Nationwide v Davisons [2012], where the court made it clear that relief available under section 61 is a reality .It is important to note that the Court of Appeal decision in the Davisons case does does not establish new breach of trust principles, the Court of Appeal decision reinforces the decision in Lloyds Bank v Markandan & Uddin [2012] that a solicitor will have committed a breach of trust in parting with loan money prior to… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The appellate court will not second-guess the trial court's judgment on this issue, even if poses a hypothetical question about what a reasonable client might pay his lawyer, a model endorsed by the Court of Appeals over a decade ago in Arbor Hill v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
  In Knowles v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:15 pm
A recent decision, and one I am confident your criminal attorney or New York shoplifting lawyer or should have read, that addresses this precise issue is People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
*  When Lawyer A opens the file using the link, he or she discovers the link provides access to B's client's documents which were not expected to be disclosed and are likely to be considered confidential.This is what happened in a recent case in New York called Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. [read post]