Search for: "A. P. G." Results 4661 - 4680 of 8,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2009, 5:06 am
So now on with the links:As the Coyotes disaster heads to its final denounement, The Great One exits Phoenix with his legacy diminished (azcentral.com).Interesting academic paper on game theory and sports: pitchers throw too many fastballs and football teams should pass more (NBER via Infectious Greed) Thanks TadDespite her less than ladylike appearance at the US Open, Serena Williams looks to retain her major endorsements, Nike, Kraft and most especially P&G's… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:22 pm
He has now teamed with two plaintiffs firms and filed suit in the Eastern District of Texas against Gillette and its parent company P&G. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:26 am
  In that regard, the court held that, pursuant to Federal Rule 9(g), special damages must be pled with specificity, a standard that is not satisfied by a non-specific allegation that a plaintiff has suffered damages of an unspecified type and amount.Finally, the court also held that a ripe claim for breach of contract is a necessary element to assert a claim for bad faith. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:44 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 8:41 am
Fox, The Wisdom of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation John P. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As the Court explained"Reversal [of that conviction and dismissal of the ninth count] is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted [attempted murder], resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the [g]rand [j]ury to determine the charges" (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858, 858; see People v Comfort, 31 AD3d 1110, 1111, lv denied 7 NY3d 847). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 11:37 am by Amy L. Peck
In another effort to retain H-4 EADs, Representatives Anna G. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:53 am
Larson, RLUIPA, Distress, and Damages, 74 U Chi L Rev 1443 (2007) Kyle P. [read post]