Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 4661 - 4680 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Among other ways George stepped up, he was: “President of the Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education (2010-2011); Member, Board of Directors of Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education (2006-2009); President of Community Legal Services (2002-2003); Member, Board of Directors of Community Legal Services (2004-2006); Member of the Civil Practice & Procedure Committee for the State Bar of Arizona (2010-2012); Member of the Hearing… [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Among other ways George stepped up, he was: “President of the Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education (2010-2011); Member, Board of Directors of Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education (2006-2009); President of Community Legal Services (2002-2003); Member, Board of Directors of Community Legal Services (2004-2006); Member of the Civil Practice & Procedure Committee for the State Bar of Arizona (2010-2012); Member of the Hearing… [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Though this letter was not attached as an exhibit to the Supreme Court briefings, and had only been referenced in a single footnote in a motion submitted to Judge Vinson in district court in Florida, Paul Clement mentioned it at just the right moment during oral argument. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:30 am by Alfred Brophy
From turtle talk comes news of University of Arizona law professor James Anaya's appeal for consideration for the wellbeing of baby Veronica, who is at the center of the United States Supreme Court's decision this summer in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
On 3 September 2013 the Oklahoma Supreme Court took up the case, granting a temporary stay of an enforcement order and allowing the father to keep Veronica pending further proceedings. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:21 am by Luke Rioux
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), resulted in a decision by the state post-conviction court that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court law, and that the state post-conviction court so misread the evidence documenting the state’s Brady violations that its decision was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Just this past January, Arizona Supreme Court Rule 38(i) went into effect. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:18 am by highrank
 Since this is a United States Supreme Court case it is binding at the state level. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court to do so, and with a compensatory jury award of only $1.00 and punitive damages of $75,000, it required a lot of his own money to pay the attorneys’ fees. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm by Paul Kirgis
  Oh well, the Court explains, this is what the Supreme Court would have wanted. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
Oh well, the Court explains, this is what the Supreme Court would have wanted. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Like many remarkable events, this one started unremarkably: “During its 1872 July term, the Missouri Supreme Court announced what appeared to be an innocuous opinion concerning $100. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Law Professors Toni Massaro and Barbara Atwood will speak on a panel with attorney Steven Phillips about the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Law Professors Toni Massaro and Barbara Atwood will speak on a panel with attorney Steven Phillips about the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor v. [read post]