Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 5,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
The only defense of what transpired here is probably that it wasn't an especially high-value case -- the real amount in controversy was barely above the jurisdictional minimum for an unlimited case -- and hence counsel may not have done their absolute best. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:59 pm
Fowler v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:32 am
This movie is for the die-hard Star Wars people who know all about the clone wars even though they were barely mentioned in Episode III. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:03 pm
Reid Pointe, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:23 pm
Or, at a bare minimum, that the opinion should clearly state that it doesn't reach the issue of whether defendants were engaged in "livestock farming" as a whole, an opinion that's instead left for remand.Those are my (extended) thoughts, anyway. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Dykeman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 4:51 pm
Teague v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 1:19 am
In Alch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
In Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 pm
Cases from this year that barely missed the cut: * A.V. v. iParadigms * Mazur v. eBay * Zango v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
See McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
" Here is the abstract: In Booker v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 5:19 pm
But reviewer Bryan Burrough is so fixated on storytelling technique that I barely learned anything about the substance of Jonathan Mahler's The Challenge: Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
Congress had not taken steps to implement the Vienna Convention, the opinion said, “beyond the bare introduction of a bill in the four years since the [World Court] ruling and the four months since our ruling in Medellin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:17 am
" United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:46 am
Earlier this Term, in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
