Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 4,811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2007, 8:28 am
May 31, 2007): The officers' use of a protective pat-down and handcuffs were reasonably necessary to assure both the officers' and Gonzalez-Villa's safety, and did not amount to a custodial arrest. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
NJ holds, recognizing contrary authority, that there is no constitutional reason to justify a rule that limits search incident to custodial offenses. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Skinner (Seattle U), Ronald C. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:44 am
I know that Amnesty International Zimbabwe Chapter is one of the strong protagonists against the death penalty.For instance, it is argued that the right to life and the right to human dignity are absolute concepts; that no man has the right to terminate another person's life under any circumstances. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:45 am
Voelker's 1979-published US patent for a Bird Trap and Cat Feeder. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:02 am
It is a certiorari case involving parents who lost custody of their child after a hearing at which neither they nor their newly-appointed lawyer were present. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Kristi Brown (NFP) - custody, affirmed. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:43 am
Facts/Discussion: Mother (Gray) appeals from an order modifying child custody.Standard of Review: The Court reviews a district court's order on a petition to modify custody, visitation, and child support for an abuse of discretion.Father bore the burden of demonstrating that a material and substantial change of circumstances affecting the child's welfare has occurred and the modification would be in the child's best interest. [read post]
20 May 2007, 7:12 am
This may happen if the court finds at least one of the following: a) the adoption would not be in the child's best interests; b) the legal parents have not agreed to give up their rights; OR c) there is not a good reason to take away the rights of the legal parents. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:03 pm
The Grandparents also contend that the trial court did not have authority under Indiana Code Section 31-17-7-1 to order them to pay Mother's attorney's fees. * * * [IC 31-17-7-1 addresses costs and attorney's fees in custody and visitation disputes.] [read post]
17 May 2007, 2:02 pm
C'mon, you're thinking, what judge would buy this crock? [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:56 am
Link: Charles C. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:51 pm
§ 31-17-2.2-5(c). [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:53 pm
Horne's Market, Inc., 385 U.S. 23, 25 (1966). [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:03 pm
C. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:27 pm
Defendant was never in custody, and "Appellant is not a 'newcomer to the law', having a prior criminal history. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:57 pm
(c) In his or her judgment, the judge may supplement the agreement on issues not covered by such agreement. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
" John C. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:44 pm
This benefit is generally only available to children who have been previously in the custody of DHR. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:42 pm
This may happen if the court finds at least one of the following: a) the adoption would not be in the child's best interests; b) the legal parents have not agreed to give up their rights; OR c) there is not a good reason to take away the rights of the legal parents. [read post]
