Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 34,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm
Grounds for Dismissing Bankruptcy Cases On appeal, the court considered the Supreme Court ruling in Freshman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Did the trial court here merely "indicate a plea," as California law permits, or did it instead engage in impermissible "judicial plea bargaining. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
California Emp. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
This case provides a judicial finding that establishes a causal relationship and as an evidentiary model in presenting scientific evidence to achieve that result.Pilliod v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
After reviewing the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), California arbitration law, and Concepcion, the Court turned its attention to Gentry. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
So here, the question is whether an Oregon attorney who assists a California lawyer in an ERISA action in the Central District of California can be awarded atttorney's fees even though he's not a California lawyer.As you might gather from the rhetoric employed by Judge Smith (which includes the line "Current law does not compel us to be judicial Luddites"), the majority opinion here holds that the Oregon lawyer can, in fact, recover fees. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
The plaintiffs in the Northern District of California district court action, styled Suski v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:14 am
Eric Biber (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law) has posted The Importance of Resource Allocation in Administrative Law (American Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Concepcion (Laster), the 9th Circuit held that the phone company's consumer class action waiver clause was unconscionable under California law, and that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") does not preempt California law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Slip op. at 6-7.The Court next held that California law did not foreclose the trial court from addressing the "make available v. ensure" issue in the context of class certification. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
The McGill Rule derives from the California Supreme Court’s ruling in McGill v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Under California law, an officer making a routine stop for a traffic violation may arrest a motorist who fails to produce proof of identity and, within the limitations of the Fourth Amendment, may search the vehicle incident to the arrest. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:40 pm
California Fair Employment and Housing Comm'n v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
Specifically, in Reno v. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 2:28 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Tuesday Navarette v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm
” One interesting factor is whether the underlying case raises an issue of California law at all. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:00 am
As the United States Supreme Court observed in its decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:35 am
Indeed, even judges within the Northern District of California have not agreed upon the proper approach. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 10:51 pm
Indeed, even judges within the Northern District of California have not agreed upon the proper approach. [read post]
