Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 21,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2007, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 7:31 am
Court of Federal Claims in Res-Care, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:31 am
New York is the only state in the nation still with a "scaffold law. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Eddy of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics that, “Sunspot lull may bring on new ice age. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:47 am
Since federal law preempts California's law to the contrary.And this from a panel of left-of-center judges. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
Beltway Surgery Center, No. 93A02-0811-EX-01006; City of Michigan City v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:40 am
However, the Circuit Court, citing Garcetti v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 7:38 pm
Williams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Florida, which concerns the constitutionality of life without parole for juvenile criminals; United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:00 pm
RJF Chiropractic Center, Inc., v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
A few weeks ago, we wrote about United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Today the Washington Supreme Court hears arguments in King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
From the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:49 am
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Pella Corporation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm
Barr, a case that centers on the “stop-time rule,” the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act examined by the court in Pereira v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:18 pm
To be sure, the physician’s First Amendment rights not to speak are implicated, see Wooley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Why would any sane republican democrat ratify a document giving small pockets of population the same voting prerogatives as population centers hundreds of times larger? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
Jones and United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Plaintiffs will now regularly plead that their state law claims against device manufacturers run "parallel" to the FDA's requirements and so are not preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
