Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 10:35 am
They derive from an old English law. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
The decision in Timbs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
The Disciplinary Board found a serious and obvious error in the Examiner's Report and remitted the script back to the Examination Board for re-marking.Tristan Sherliker discusses the English Court of Appeal's judgment in ZyXEL v TQ Delta [2019] EWCA Civ 1277.DesignsKatfriend Ewan Grist analyses English design decisions over the past 12 years finding that there is quite a lot for designers and design owners to feel content about.Book ReviewsHayleigh Bosher reviews… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
As “noble” is not owned by Barnes & Noble, Barnesandnoble.com, LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
Co.(2nd Dept., 7/22/2020)Before the Roman Catholic Mass was said in English in Mahwah, New Jersey, my brothers and sisters and I had to ask "May I be excused? [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:34 am
CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Labuda in People v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:32 pm
In Fox v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Supreme Court in Shute v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 2:30 am
This explains why in VIRBAC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Supreme Court in Shute v. [read post]
