Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2020, 11:28 am
We don't throw 'em in jail or impose a statutory fine of $500 per violation or anything like that. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:09 pm
So if Harris gets any money, the U.S. ends up with it (in order to satisfy the restitution order).The trial court says that's fine, and Harris appeals.The Ninth Circuit's per curiam opinion sounds mostly right to me. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
In a way that really, materially matters.So I'd be fine with an opinion that says that announcement drops don't matter when the stock bounces back completely (after adjusting for all other events) upon the subsequent disclosure of the fraud. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:02 pm
Things go fine like that for seven years or so.But then Ms. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:31 am
Plaintiff is fine with that. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:47 am
All this is fine under the law of Korea.Ms. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
But the Court of Appeal is fine with holding no duty with respect to that one as a matter of law and yet imposing potential liability on the other. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
(Justice Moore says that "caretakers [] are subject to increased penalties under section 368(e)," but as far as I can tell, that's not actually true, since the penalties for caretakers and noncaretakers are exactly the same in paragraphs (d) and (e); two, three or four years, with the exact same fines etc.)But here's the rub: you're not guilty of violating Section 368(d) if you're a caretaker. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
It's totally fine. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
Which is in turn why the expert's testimony is inadmissible to the per se offense at issue.Which some people may perhaps be fine with. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
For a full 24 hours after I read this opinion, my thought about it was this:I don't even understand it. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:41 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
So yesterday the Supreme Court decided, in Florence v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Referred to as the biggest defamation trial in U.S. history, the case of BPI v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:45 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:50 am
But some such workarounds are fine; compare, e.g., Johanns v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:19 am
VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:52 am
In Marsh v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 12:46 pm
Ottimo evidently neglected to make the bankruptcy known on his Form U4 until April 19, 2002.In the Opinion, the SEC confirmed FINRA’s findings that Ottimo’s failure to make timely disclosures of liens, civil judgments and a bankruptcy was violative of FINRA By-Laws Article V, Section 2(c). [read post]
