Search for: "German v. German" Results 4661 - 4680 of 5,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Call ERIC (European Research Infrastructure Consortium) (IP finance)   Germany German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht): Annual report for 2008 (Class 46) German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) finds SCHLÜSEL lacks distinctiveness for locksmith and security devices and services (Schlüssel means ‘key’) (Class 46)   India Confederation of Indian Industry’s conference on combating counterfeiting and… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
” R v Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
(PatLit) (Innovationpartners) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Librarian's Notebook) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski v Doll briefs (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (AwakenIP) (BlawgIT) (PatentBIOtech) Microsoft - Storing text docs in XML may run afoul of Microsoft patent (Ars Technica) Twitter – TechRadium files suit against Twitter claiming… [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc  ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:35 pm
(v) Securing evidence to be used before a court, board, officer, or investigating committee. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
It also introduces the Austrian reference on Art. 15(3) ‘Brussels I' in the "Pammer" case (now also Case C-144/09, Alpenhof v. [read post]