Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 4661 - 4680 of 6,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(Mere handing down of decisions, I expect, would not be enough. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
Let's look at the latest news jurisdiction by jurisdiction:Brazilian antitrust authority CADE grants unconditional clearance in decision that stresses three times that the task at hand is to protect consumer welfare and the competitive process, not individual competitors (i.e., Sony and Google)U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  We are not exactly disinterested observers: we are hard at work at the moment on a joint book project on many of these themes. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:15 pm by Andrew Cole
I find it hard to believe that we have perfected the art of spell checking. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Romag is a clear example: there’s a complicated history, and figuring out how to think about it in light of TM’s evolution over time is hard. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
This is a very hard part of copyright law for many people to understand, including many copyright lawyers and many artists. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:00 am
As I understand it, BitLocker needs to create two hard drive volumes. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:00 am
As I understand it, BitLocker needs to create two hard drive volumes. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm by Nathan
  A handful of known locations are looked at, and what’s found there is what goes into the database. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:11 am
  On the one hand, for purposes of ADA coverage, the Supreme Court treated "reproduction" as a major life activity, the substantial limitation of which gave rise to a "disability" in Bragdon v. [read post]