Search for: "Head v State" Results 4661 - 4680 of 14,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Judge Breyer, normally one of the Court's most liberal justices, gave a strong indication that the Court is heading in the direction of protecting drug makers when he stated: "Who should make the decisions that will determine whether a drug is on balance, going to save people or, on balance, going to hurt people?... [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Daniel Schwartz
Well, for one, the policy did not explicitly state that its policy could be tweaked in some instances to accommodate religious practices. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 7:48 am
I'm coming a little late to the party, but the case of Omega World Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am by Jeremy Speres
  It is also noteworthy that the anti-monopoly sentiment first expressed in Foschini has now spread to another court, albeit in the same division.Etraction v TyrecorThis judgement had me scratching my head a fair bit. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
(a) It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
(a) It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
US District Court for the District of Maryland: US v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:22 am by Adam Wagner
Carl Gardner, of the Head of Legal blog, also provides an excellent post here. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]