Search for: "High v State"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
(Scott v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:18 pm
On July 21, 1925, in The State of Tennessee v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sergey Aleynikov was convicted of stealing and transferring a proprietary computer source code used in his former employer’s high-frequency trading system, in violation of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (“EEA”), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
The SEC has filed a complaint stating the Mavericks owner knew the information was confidential, but decided to trade based on that information to avoid a potential $750,000 loss. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
But this litigation remains a high-risk strategy for both companies. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:35 am
In Gross v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
” [15] An athlete who resides in Texas and does not pay an income tax will still have to pay at a high rate when they play in California. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:16 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Allan & Ors, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1022 (18 April 2011) Beesley & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1021 (18 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) S (Children) , RE [2011] EWCA Civ 454 (18 April 2011) RS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 434 (18 April 2011) Rooff Ltd. v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 435 (18 April 2011)… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
In my last post on Chevron v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 9:46 am
Sig Christenson at Military Reporters & Editors directs us to his piece at San Antonio Express News (of CAAF fame) about United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
" This was determined last month in People v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:09 pm
In granting that request, in Mendoza v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:42 pm
Swegon North America Inc. and Rossman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
In Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurance SA and others [2010] EWHC 1941 (QB) the High Court had to determine, as a preliminary issue, whether Rome II (a regime for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations) applied to Homawoo's claim against GMF Assurance, a French insurance company, for damages for personal injury caused to Homawoo during a road traffic accident in France. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:30 am
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Enter Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:48 am
The state’s high court held that the plaintiff’s condition was an identified condition for which she sought ongoing treatment from the defendant, and the statute of limitations would start running only after such continued treatment was terminated. [read post]
