Search for: "J True"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 7,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Earlier this year, at [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch), Arnold J said Interflora could call witnesses from the first exercise but not from the second exercise. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
Michael J. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:52 am
Eve, J.). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:54 pm
If you or someone you know has been charged with a Massachusetts crime, contact the Law Office of Robert J. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
Eve, J.). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 2:39 pm
Yes, it is true that amidst all the digital noise to which my email and RSS feeds are regularly subjected by LSUC, the CBA, the OBA and their ilk, I was vaguely aware at some point last year that the Law Society was studying the difficulties some articling candidates were having finding jobs, with a view to making recommendations to address this concern. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 7:27 am
We don’t know if it’s true but if it were, would O.J. really get to make money by having committed murder? [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:17 pm
There’s nothing worse than an amorphous assignment; this is especially true when you don’t even quite know what you want . . . because, then, how can your staffperson divine it? [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:59 am
by Bradford J. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:09 pm
A little time and attention to the statute and to the existing expert treatises about it, in particular Kris, David and Wilson, J. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Well, that’s just not true, but apparently we have been remiss. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:30 am
J. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
Just about a year ago, J. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
Just about a year ago, J. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
Correct errors j. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
He wants a true solution while Google's Motorola would rather keep the door open to even more problems. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:16 am
Editor’s Note: Peter J. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
Similarly, according to the Synthes Court: It is, of course, true that controlling stockholders are putatively free under our law to sell their own bloc for a premium or even to take a different premium in a merger. [read post]
