Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
Kennedy cited language in Justice Thomas' separate opinion joining in the result only, saying the Stevens opinion was wrong in extending the Ohralik approach. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:04 am
., and Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined as to Part III. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:46 am
., and Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined as to Part III. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Zavala-Carty will be coming down by 3:52 this afternoon . . . .Players: Justice Breyer authors main decision, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito.Stevens concurs, sort of, joined by Ginsburg, sort of.Scalia and Thomas concur, but really dissent.Souter dissents (and speaks truth to power on what the decision really means for sentencing practice).Facts: Victor Rita was charged with a variety of crimes arising from false statements he made before the grand jury,… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
My friend Jim Ho (a former clerk for Justice Thomas who's now an appellate lawyer at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher) reports that Justice Kennedy is "16 for 16 in 5-4... [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
But the disaffinity of Justices Kennedy and Breyer for the Sixth Amendment jury trial right suggests they won't join an opinion praising Blakely's view of jury trial rights. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Kennedy, 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:36 pm
[The next few paragraphs of the article detail some important decisions handed down over the past year, which appear to confirm Toobin's claims].All these conservative victories were decided by votes of five to four, with Kennedy joining Roberts, Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas to form the majority. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:17 pm
Perhaps a close reading of all of this Term's cases wouldn't bear this out, but my subjective and informal impression is that when the Court splits 5 (Roberts/Scalia/Kennedy/Thomas/Alito) - 4 (Stevens/Souter/Ginsburg/Breyer), the 5 are basically ignoring or dismissing objections raised by the 4.Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:57 pm
Thomas is out, having already written eight majorities. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:26 am
Since Souter and Kennedy, all appointed Justices -- Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Roberts, and Alito —- have fulfilled the agenda of the Presidents who appointed them. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:11 am
Justice Thomas dissented and Justice Kennedy took no part in the case. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 1:34 pm
Kennedy School of Government in Boston, still identifies with his colleagues in this situation. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
Kennedy. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
Joining him were Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Samuel Alito Jr. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:25 pm
., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined that opinion in full; STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined it as to all but Part II-B; and BREYER, J., joined as to all but footnote 1 and Part II-B. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:24 am
They're all rich, at least on paper, except maybe Justices Kennedy and Thomas. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Supreme Court Justices' Financial Reports Show Most to Be Millionaires
The Associated Press
What do Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy lack that the other Supreme Court justices have in abundance? [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:01 pm
Kennedy" title="Atom feed">Site Feed [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
Justice Thomas is likely to agree. [read post]
