Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 13,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), was wrong and Lofton v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), was wrong and Lofton v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:10 am
Zauderer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
The CJEU’s decision in Colloseum v Levi Strauss (Case C-12/12) provides a good example for such a case. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:01 am
Per U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Codonics, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:53 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
” The New York Times explained, “Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
” The New York Times explained, “Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Again, this is because: (1) Ketamine is FDA-approved as an anesthetic; (2) Drugs with one approved indication can be prescribed off-label for other indications; and (3) The Ryan Haight Act allowed for Schedules II-V controlled substances to be prescribed over telehealth, without a prior in-person examination. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
” Chong v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
” Chong v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:17 am
" The New York Times explained, "Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
– an off-label use. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Labeling and reuse requirements for cylinders with HFCs, the super-powerful greenhouse gases. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:31 am
The buyer has labelled the application of the CISG ‘surprising’, because no claim in appeal targeted applicable law. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Additional Resources: Estate of Key v. [read post]