Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 4661 - 4680 of 21,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 5:40 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
However, before you can get compensation, it is essential to show the defendants negligence. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
  Because once you know that your product "will be" used for a crime, you're liable too unless you either actively stop the office or affirmatively dispose of the item(s). [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:50 pm by J. Ross Pepper
  Many times, not only have we had to prove that the defendant was contractually liable for unpaid commissions, but also, we have had to establish and to prove the amount of the commissions owed. [read post]
At that point, the disclosing company’s ability to “exercise or defend” any trade secret rights in the disclosed information would be lost. [read post]
At that point, the disclosing company’s ability to “exercise or defend” any trade secret rights in the disclosed information would be lost. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
This is somewhat unusual since the driver of the case clearly appears to be the Defendants alleged infringement of the Claimant’s privacy. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The bulk of defendants= argument is that Nagan was an independent contractor rather than a government employee, and therefore, the government cannot be held liable for Nagan=s tortuous acts or omissions (see Roditis, 122 F3d at 111). [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:02 am by Merrida Coxwell
Defendants in these cases are only responsible for covering the losses for which they are liable. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am by Kevin
The Ellis court did not need to reach the defendants First Amendment argument, but that would have been successful, too. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:37 am by Searcy Law
Company Vehicle Accidents If you are injured in a car accident (or truck accident) with a company vehicle, then you may be entitled under Florida law to impose the defendant-driver’s liability on the employer pursuant to the doctrine of vicarious liability. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:37 am by Searcy Law
Company Vehicle Accidents If you are injured in a car accident (or truck accident) with a company vehicle, then you may be entitled under Florida law to impose the defendant-driver’s liability on the employer pursuant to the doctrine of vicarious liability. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:44 pm by Rebecca Edelson and Angela Reid
The default likely will have substantial economic consequences for defendants since they cannot defend against plaintiff WeRide’s complaint which seeks $249 million in punitive damages in addition to a permanent injunction requiring defendants to refrain from utilizing WeRide’s confidential information. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:37 pm by Steven M. Sweat
The California Court of Appeal considered whether the trial court erred in its jury instructions and a denial of the defendants motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in the case of Alaniz v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Directors can be liable under Caremark, Vice Chancellor Laster said, if they knowingly or systematically fail to (1) implement reporting policies or a system of controls; or (2) monitor or oversee the Company’s operations. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am by Christopher Simon
Georgia Slip-and-Fall Analysis In determining whether a defendant landowner is liable for a slip-and-fall victim’s injuries, courts will typically engage in a two-part analysis. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:46 am by Sofia Papaspyropoulou
Finally, addressing a concern of the tribunal, the judge observed that the outcome would not be leaving Noble without recourse: Noble’s liability to the shipowner was the result of their decision to pay the shipowner in settlement rather than defend the claim by reference to the true condition of the goods. [read post]
3 May 2020, 12:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
But it will be particularly interesting to monitor this case in order to see whether the plaintiff’s attempt to hold LabCorp executives liable for the cybersecurity incident at AMCA is permitted to stand. [read post]