Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 4661 - 4680 of 5,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
Remember, in keeping with Gibbs J, [3] the film companies argued that iiNet had knowledge that its requirement that users not infringe copyright was being ignored. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
By Milton Heumann*   The classic “you’ve come a long way baby” mantra from the world of tobacco advertising has an analogous application to plea bargaining. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 2:03 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Comm’r, Examinations 1998) [the caller mistakenly referred to Matter of Izummi, a different precedent decision] and the May 30, 2013 USCIS EB-5 policy memorandum. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:54 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Gomery adopted the same elements of the tort as the previous public disclosure of private facts case, and found the ex-boyfriend to be liable: (a) the defendant publicized an aspect of the plaintiff’s private life; (b) the plaintiff did not consent to the publication; (c) The matter publicized or its publication would be highly offensive to a reasonable person; and (d) The publication was not of legitimate concern to the public. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
    In finding that Wise had complied with his obligations two matters were clarified by the Court of Appeal as matter which were in the public interest:   1) Is the Commissioner obliged to reach a definitive decision on the merits of each and every complaint or does he have a discretion to decide that some other outcome is appropriate? [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
According to Laws LJ: “[to] be or purport to be a notice of appeal, the document must (a) identify the appellant, (b) identify the decision against which he seeks to appeal and (c) pace Ouseley J in Kaminksi v Judicial Authority of Poland [2010] EWHC 2772, set out at least the gist of the basis on which the appeal is sought to be presented … So much is, I think, inherent in any sensible understanding of a notice of appeal. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:52 pm by familoo
If that were the case the many inaccurate articles published before the publication of Mostyn J’s Court of Protection case would by now have been corrected. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Is the threat of personal liability—no matter how seemingly remote—worth the compensation allocated to the position? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
The company maintained that it “was not part of any conspiracy and the judgment was fundamentally flawed as a matter of class action law. [read post]