Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
That’s one of the constitutional rights specified under Crim R 11(C)(2)(c), which requires strict compliance. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
Case C-5/11 Titus Alexander Jochen Donner is another reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:25 am
Waiting until we have a final or even near final text is not good enough. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 669-690 (2010).Griffin, Ronald C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Suppose that a consumer orders goods from a third party’s website and, at the time of ordering, is not confused as the trade origin of the goods; but when the goods arrive some days later, the goods are labelled in a manner which wrongly leads the consumer to believe that the goods emanate from the trade mark proprietor. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
This submission was based on sub-paragraph VI.E.7.3.3.c) of the 6th edition of the “Case Law” book as far as it is identical to the 5th edition (see sub-paragraph VI.E.6.2.2.c)). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
In most industries, there are no firm legal barriers that prohibit the actual physical exchange of the goods offered for sale. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
In You're My Huckleberry, I'm Your Jim, BLB post author C. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:14 pm
For good reasons or bad, they didn't do so with Chou. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 12:12 am
The Supreme Court of this Country has passed many land-mark judgments and we have also seen the results. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:05 pm
” Moreover, when an individual is so well known, he or she is entitled to the protection of Section 2(c) without having to show a connection with the involved goods or services. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:45 am
It also maintained that Examining Attorney David C. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Plasticos and Colgate-Palmolive (EPLAW) Elio, Edwin in tug-of-love over FIORUCCI name – Case C-263/09 Edwin v OHIM (IPKat) ONEL edges closer to resolution as Hague Court pops the questions (IPKat) No abuse, no answers: AG gives Budweiser’s dirty tricks a clean bill of health: Bud? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Attorney Mark C. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
” Overall, I would say that the brief does more harm to its cause than good. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
App. 2007) (all citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:54 am
A trade mark shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid: (a) if it is identical with an earlier trade mark, and the goods or services for which the trade mark is applied for or is registered are identical with the goods or services for which the earlier trade mark is protected; ... [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:38 am
– (iv) all the rights exclusively to use the designation “FIORUCCI” and exclusively to manufacture and sell the clothes and other goods bearing the name “FIORUCCI”.13 years ago, in December 1997, Edwin applied to register the word mark ELIO FIORUCCI as a Community trade mark; registration was granted in April 1999 and all looked good for the Japanese company until February 2003, when Elio Fiorucci sought revocation and/or a… [read post]
