Search for: "Million v State"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 24,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2010, 6:48 am
A recent New York state trial court decision, Romano v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:00 pm
Litigation Release No. 20021 - SEC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:36 pm
According to BBC News, the suit entitled Ernie Chambers v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
In Western States Trucking Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:17 pm
S.E.C. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Pirani v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Pirani v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:22 pm
Justus et al v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
These costly and burdensome regulations will eventually force new permitting requirements for more than 6 million stationary sources, including 200,000 manufacturing facilities, 37,000 farms and millions of other sources, such as universities, schools, hospitals and even American homes -- impacting every aspect of our economy. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:59 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:57 am
Via Consumerist comes the news that Deutch is on the wrong side of the "v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm
Another interesting case has been filed in Louisiana, according to this all-too-brief Courthouse News summary (thanks, Andy): Twyla M_____ v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm
(Padwa v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm
(Padwa v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:25 am
Muniauction, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
Under a proposed settlement agreement filed with the court Monday, April 21, giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company would pay $4.4 million to resolve class allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in its handling of criminal background checks for online applicants (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, ED VA). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:53 pm
In Waltrip v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 8:41 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion in Yellen v. [read post]
