Search for: "No Named Defendant"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 57,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
More initial interest confusion silliness, including the court's belief that a defendant's disclaimer tacitly admits IIC [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:49 am
The issue before the court in that case concerned whether opt-in plaintiffs were required to submit new consent forms after the named plaintiffs added a claim to the original complaint. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:27 am
The new owners of the allegedly stolen domain names were named as defendants in the original suit, but according to news reports, Madsen claims to be a good faith buyer and the Star-Ledger said he has had civil discussions with the investors. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
AppealThe defendant appealed the decision on the basis that use of a company or shop name does not constitute trade mark use. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
A memo sent by a union to its bargaining unit members, which named two firefighters who had sued the union and the county for retaliation and stated that union members would likely have to pay more in dues to defend against these “frivolous” claims, was not speech on a matter of public concern, an Eleventh Circuit panel ruled in rejecting the union’s claim that the First Amendment immunized its speech. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 3:21 pm
The information includes the name and photograph of the offender, his approximate address and the address of any institution of higher education he attends. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:00 pm
To find a customer relationship in such a situation would impose responsibility on a company whose name was never so much as utilized to induce the investors to part with their funds." [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Likewise, LW failed to allege facts showing injury based on the use of its name as opposed to its licensor’s name or nothing at all. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:04 am
Then, defendants allegedly created a new name, AnsiStim, for their device and applied for their own FDA 510(K) clearance number. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Pandistelloso, Gallettoso, Rigoloso, etc.The infringing use of the claimant’s signs was found in relation to the labelling of the cushions, their commercial name, but also metatags, search engine keywords, domains names, and social media ‘hashtagged’-terms. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
Accordingly, said the court, it agree with the Supreme Court's granting certain branches of City Defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing those causes of actions alleging harassment by City Defendants and that City Defendants abetted harassment in violation of the NYCHRL insofar as asserted against each of the named City Defendants. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:20 am
Defendants are not usually worried that a named plaintiff with a legitimate grievance is trying to "extort" $100 from them. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
It is claimed that decedent directed the defendant to provide for a residuary clause naming plaintiffs as legatees thereof. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
In using the fictitious name, the defendant "conceal[ed] the fact that the assignments were being awarded to" his company ("Advance")- someone who also represented NYCTA in defending personal injury lawsuits. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
Accordingly, said the court, it agree with the Supreme Court's granting certain branches of City Defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing those causes of actions alleging harassment by City Defendants and that City Defendants abetted harassment in violation of the NYCHRL insofar as asserted against each of the named City Defendants. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:11 am
To find a customer relationship in such a situation would impose responsibility on a company whose name was never so much as utilized to induce the investors to part with their funds." [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:14 pm
I would too, but then I'd also like to sign my own name on the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Claims against other defendants were dismissed.In Hogan v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 2:25 pm
In the answer submitted by the health system, a cross-claim has been asserted for judgment over against "Kenneth Doe" who is not named in the complaint, and a second cross-claim for indemnification from defendant employee. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:01 am
Plaintiffs sent proper pre-suit notice with a HIPAA authorization to defendant, and the authorization stated that the patient name was “Branson Vance Jackson,” the name of the deceased child. [read post]
