Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 4661 - 4680 of 6,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The U.S. amendment called for deletion of the phrase “, or by statute” at the end of para. 7(a) of art. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:41 am by sally
North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc and others [2011] EWHC 910 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 138 “Para 1.5 of Practice Direction 39A supplementing CPR Pt 39 did not deem a hearing to be in private which had not been listed as a private matter. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by NL
It was accepted that the decorations were in a poor, rather tatty state, although dreadful. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am by Adam Zanjani
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
If so, how, if at all, may an earlier Grand Chamber ruling be reviewed at Strasbourg if a State or States insist that it goes too far, or subsequent developments throw the original ruling into doubt? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
"The decision is Realcomp II, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
;¶106, et seq.: SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION UNJUST ENRICHMENT PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASSES v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
See paras 23 – 29 of  R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726   for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).GÃteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]