Search for: "Paul M."
Results 4661 - 4680
of 10,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
by: Kathleen M. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:00 pm
Doe 1’s counsel, the famed freedom of speech lawyer Paul Levy, of Public Citizen, wrote in a statement on Friday that the decision was a “mixed blessing for anonymous Internet speakers in future cases. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:14 pm
Paul M. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
Nelson (now with the Public Citizen Litigation Group, then a law clerk to Justice White while Greenmoss was under consideration) and Paul M. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:29 pm
William M. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:11 am
Paul noted his signature on a letter submitted to the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am
Group 11 – BRUSSELS I RECAST – JURISDICTION CAMPUZANO DÍAZ, Beatriz The scope of application of the rules on jurisdiction after the recast of Brussels I Regulation MIGLIO, Alberto The Recast of Brussels I and Jurisdiction Over Third State Defendants HERRANZ BALLESTEROS, Mónica Law applicable to choice of court agreements in Brussels I Recast SÁNCHEZ DÍAZ, Sara Choice of court agreements: Brussels I Regulation Recast AÑOVEROS TERRADAS,… [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
Businessweek: The Case Against Law School, by Paul M. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
As a reminder, Judge Wright's order required these people and entities to appear for the following purposes: Thus, the Court amends its February 7, 2013 Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 48) to include sanctions against the persons and entities in subparagraphs a–m below: a) John Steele, of Steele Hansmeier PLLC, Prenda Law, Inc., and/or Livewire Holdings LLC; b) Paul Hansmeier, of Steele Hansmeier PLLC and/or Livewire Holdings LLC; c) Paul Duffy, of Prenda… [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:14 am
“I’m definitely still interested in a career in international law after going to Belarus. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Stanford PACS Center: Paul Brest responds to Rob Reich: "What are foundations for?" [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
I’m posting that December article again, in its entirety, without edits. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
United States District Judge Michael M. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
For now, the most prominent drone critics are libertarians like Rand Paul. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
Neal, Alexander M. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
I’ve not added a URL here because I’m not trying to sell books (it had a wonderful run as a New York Times bestseller) rather, I mention the book merely to note my long interest in watching these politicians, because I believe they are potentially dangerous to our democracy. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
I’m sorry. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 1:38 pm
Paul Goldstein of Stanford Law School. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
O'Neil, and Paul M. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:38 pm
For his part, Paul Clement, the lawyer for the plaintiffs below, focused his oral argument on the “vindication of rights doctrine,” arguing that the much-invoked strong federal policy favoring arbitration must yield where arbitration would effectively nullify a statutory right. [read post]
