Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 4661 - 4680 of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 10:27 am by Sue D. Nym
Since 1993, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has pursued an “aggressive campaign” to free itself from oversight by and accountability to the courts. [1] At the same time, the USPTO has been just as aggressive in ignoring the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and related administrative laws that place responsibilities on the USPTO vis-à-vis the public. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:00 am
But the application was filed more than one year after she entered the United States, thus violating the filing deadline. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
  Fans of IFP petitions, do not despair: Martinez v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:49 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-297Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:58 pm
Here is the essence of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Jesse M. Coleman
That is, the defendant must “establish[ ] that a cause of action against him arises from an act by him in furtherance of the exercise of his right of petition or free speech under the United States or Louisiana Constitution in connection with a public issue. [read post]
14 May 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Takings alert [Ilya Shapiro, David McDonald on Cato certiorari petition in case of 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
Supreme Court issued an order inviting the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views fo the United States in NEDC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The FSIA is the federal law that protects foreign states from lawsuits, and makes foreign sovereign property located in the United States immune from attachment.The plaintiffs argued that Section 1610 of the FSIA makes a "commercial activity" exception by declaring that “[a] foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts … in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property … is… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
The court did not act on the federal government’s petition for review of a dispute over whether the Trump administration can terminate the program known as “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which allows undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children to apply for protection from deportation. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:42 am by J.D. Admissions
But if you thought that you would be working on amicus curiae briefs to the Second Circuit or even the United States Supreme Court, you would also be right! [read post]