Search for: "Records Distribution" Results 4661 - 4680 of 17,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
I was pleased to have been able to attend a portion of the 8th Annual UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 12:24 pm by J. Ross Pepper
Notably, in their proof at trial, Plaintiff Sons introduced no medical records or testimony supporting their allegations. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 11:41 am by Chris Castle
 But–all the majors have outsourced their U.S. physical distribution to a company called “Direct Shot” and the result is a disaster for this delicate ecosystem. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 5:29 am by Staff Attorney
According to newsources, a study revealed that 7.3% of financial advisors had a customer complaint on their record when records from 2005 to 2015 were examined. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Panel explains that the asset does not consist of the public or private keys, or the distributed ledger itself; these are all deemed to be items of pure information. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:19 am by Jonathan Bailey
The reason was that they had evidence that some of the individuals suing them had not lost their recordings. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:40 am by musicandcopyright
However, despite the anomaly, the US is the biggest country for performance rights, with distributions from collective management organization SoundExchange last year exceeding $950m. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Colleen V. Chien
” Certain cases have also established that a random distribution of burdens passes constitutional muster. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:13 pm by Adam Schwartz
An entity must conduct an annual impact assessment if it uses algorithmic decision-making to determine: eligibility for housing, education, employment, or credit; distribution of ads for the same; or access to public accommodations. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  In particular, Cox would not agree, as Nixon insisted, to promise that he wouldn’t again invoke the judicial process to compel further production of recordings, notes or memoranda regarding private presidential conversations. [read post]
Because Trump could not have bribed Zelensky under § 201(b)(1), the question becomes whether Trump sought a bribe under § 201(b)(2).As to the actus reus element, from the public record it appears that the President demanded or sought from Zelensky at least one of the following things: information, investigations, and/or a public declaration of a Ukrainian investigation into Burisma, the Bidens, and the 2016 election.For the third element of the bribery offense, the question is… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
California’s so-called “Gig Worker Bill,” Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), goes into effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:28 am by Law Lady
Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Marital liabilities -- Loans -- Trial court erred in ruling that former wife had no obligations as to a loan given to the parties by former husband's mother during the marriage -- Trial court must treat the debt as a marital liability and order distribution of it accordingly where trial court made no finding of misconduct, failed to consider the factors listed in section 61.075(1), and failed to articulate a sufficient… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
December 1, 2019New Website for LawyersTrial of a New York Matrimonial and Custody Action (www.nysdivorce.net)  deals with the trial of a New York matrimonial and custody action. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:33 am by Kit Johnson
” The record indicates that Congress intended the “question of law” provision to “permit judicial review over those issues that were historically reviewable on habeas. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:57 am by Ben
  In a suit filed by Boumendil it is alleged alleged that instead of replaying the notes (as was stipulated in the licensing contract), Gilmour went on to interpolate the exact recorded notes. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 11:03 am by Michael Lowe
  The FSA also changes things so this mandatory 15 year sentence applies only to those who have one prior conviction for either (a) a “felony drug offense” or (b) a “serious violent felony” on their records. [read post]