Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 4661 - 4680 of 5,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Neither can most evidence obtained as an indirect result of the unlawful search or seizure. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by eputsche
On Dec. 19, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, upheld a lower court’s dismissal of a civil suit involving the fatal shooting of two family dogs by police officers who were executing a search warrant for drug-related activity in 2013. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:43 am
Rule 41(g) provides for `[a] person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property [to] move for the property's return. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
  The Current State of the Law of Border Searches           The Fourth Amendment provides in relevant part that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm by David Kravets
The justices and lower courts have routinely sanctioned search warrants based on drug-detecting dogs r [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:12 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the Fourth Amendment case on whether an unauthorized driver has rights to challenge the search of a rental car. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal decisions released by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 5, 2022. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm by Michael Lowe
For more, read: Exigent Circumstances: What They Are And How They Allow Police To Search And Seize Without A Warrant. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm by Orin Kerr
The dog alerted, and a warrant was obtained to search the motor home. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:46 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
In reaffirming the Smith standard, the Court outlined the case’s history, as well as some of the law applicable to vehicle stops and subsequent search and seizure activity. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:46 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
In reaffirming the Smith standard, the Court outlined the case’s history, as well as some of the law applicable to vehicle stops and subsequent search and seizure activity. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm by Orin Kerr
Moreover, the common law doesn’t seem to provide an answer: The common law of searches and seizures provided a defense to a civil tort action, not an independent cause of action. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:23 am
" In a statement submitted to Feingold for a June hearing on the issue, he noted that the executive branch has long had "plenary authority to conduct routine searches and seizures at the border without probable cause or a warrant" to prevent drugs and other contraband from entering the country. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
Plaintiff refused a pocket search after being arrested in a casino for being in the wrong place reading a magazine. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Naturally, to get a search warrant for someone’s property, the officer would need probable cause to believe that the warrant would uncover evidence of a crime. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:43 am by Brandon Grable
If the officer takes your device, they are not permitted to view or search it (and they certainly do not have authority to delete or destroy anything). [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 6:23 pm
" In it, he mocks the librarians who challenged Section 215, the provision allowing for seizure of library records and he argues in favor of sneak and peek search warrants and notes the legality of roving wiretaps. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:52 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On Friday, June 10, 2011, three federal search warrants were executed by the above agencies in White County and Lonoke County. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:40 am by Evan M. Levow
Constitution prohibits police from conducting searches and seizures without a warrant, but the courts have identified numerous exceptions. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:28 am by admin
In his remarkable order dismissing the charges, Judge Matz acknowledged that “most district judges are reluctant to find that the prosecutors’ actions were flagrant, willful, or in bad faith,” but he concluded that “it is with deep regret that this Court is compelled to find that the Government team allowed a key FBI agent to testify untruthfully before the grand jury, inserted material falsehoods into affidavits submitted to magistrate judges in support of applications for… [read post]