Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 121,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
See Op. at 12 citing Monroe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 4:12 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
This NOI comes after the USCO cancelled the AI-generated artwork portions of the copyright registration submitted by author Kristina Kashtanova in the case of Zarya of the Dawn (see the IPKat here) and issued (in March 2023) the “Copyright registration guide: works containing material generated by artificial intelligence” (as reported by the IPKat here). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
However, the vast majority of class actions I see in the technology industry are just opportunistic attempts by lawyers to extract settlements from large corporations. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
On August 24, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state-law securities claims in Kirschner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
See Banks v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
Adversary Proceedings See this practice note for a discussion of adversary proceedings commenced in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm
A recent court order in the case of Woodstream Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
” See id.; Cal. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:00 am
Amazon, 2023 FC 1156 and Watson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
At issue in Monterosso v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
At issue in Monterosso v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
[5] See Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Int., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:34 pm
This is consistent with how the issue was considered before the 2022 High Court decisions in CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2. 2. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
