Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4661 - 4680
of 15,315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
§ 924(c)(3)(B). [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
The amendments deleted a reference to B&P 17206, which had details about damage-setting for violations (1798.150(b)). [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
The present Treaty shall not preclude the application of measures: (a) […] (b) relating to fissionable materials, the radioactive byproducts thereof, or the sources thereof; (c) regulating the production of or traffic in arms, ammunition and implements of war … (d) necessary to fulfill the obligations of a High Contracting Party for the maintenance or restoration of international peace and security, or necessary to protect its essential security interests. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:07 pm
United States, 795 F.3d 1338, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am
Point 3(b) tracks Section 230(c)(2)(b) closely. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:51 am
C&D Zodiac—B/E Aerospace argued the PTAB and Federal Circuit use an improper, two-step approach for determining whether a patent claim is obvious. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Determining the employer of a workers' compensation benefit claimant is critical to determining if a respondent may be sued by the claimantDube v County of Rockland, 2018 NY Slip Op 02597, Appellate Division, Second Department New York State's Workers' Compensation Law provides that:1. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:21 am
Circuit overturned the SEC's finding that Lorenzo violated Rule 10b-5(b), but upheld the remainder of the violations, noting that Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) and Securities Act Section 17(a)(1) do not speak in terms of an individual's "making" a false statement, which was the critical language construed in Janus. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
Civ.R. 9(C). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
CPL§ 270(1)(b), deals with a prospective juror who has evinced an actual bias, defined as “a state of mind that is likely to preclude him from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at trial. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:53 am
Broad Interpretation of State and Local Prohibitions – The Commission broadly interpreted Sections 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) and Section 253(a) of the Communications Act that limit state or local laws, regulations and other legal requirements that “prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting” the provision of wireless service. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:57 pm
In R. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am
This class excludes (a) Defendant, its officers, directors, management, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates; (b) all federal and state governmental entities; (c) all persons or entities who purchased Relevant Cellular Phones for purposes of resale; and (d) any judges or justices involved in this action and any members of their immediate families or their staff. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm
Id. at § 1798.150(a)(B) & (C). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm
Id. at § 1798.150(a)(B) & (C). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:45 pm
Desmond v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
When backup arrived, officer’s B and C handcuffed Pagnani and walked her down the porch stairs to Officer A’s police car. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Hubbard, for Cash Zone, LLC d/b/a Cash Biz, Respondent.Patrick E. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
“Necessity” is the mother of discretion.United States v. [read post]
