Search for: "State v. David" Results 4661 - 4680 of 14,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
” At XPertHR, David Weisenfeld covers Monday’s decision in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Just yesterday, a Ninth Circuit panel rejected this argument in Bowers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Paul Parsley, the former sheriff of Bullitt County, Kentucky, fired deputy sheriff David Greenwell immediately after he learned through a newspaper article that his deputy intended to run against him in the next election. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am by David Hart QC
Network Rail [2006] EWHC 1133 (QB) (Railtrack), or YL v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The TDS terms and conditions specifically state (7.10) that the deposit will remain protected where a statutory periodic tenancy follows a fixed term tenancy. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller The following is a guest-post by David Glazier, Associate Professor of Law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:32 am by Steven Cohen
 The plaintiff hired an expert to assist in his case, and a motion to exclude was denied in part and granted in part Facts:  This case (DAVID OSTRINSKY As Administrator of the Estate of Michael Ostrinsky, deceased v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:43 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Graham v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:14 am by David Bernstein
An example of where the Court could have exhibited more deference than it did was United States v. [read post]