Search for: "State v. David." Results 4661 - 4680 of 14,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm by Steve Kalar
  (They'll feel good about themselves while serving their revocation sentences).United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:42 am by DE
” This was the famous dissent given by Associate Justice Harry Blackmun in the DeShaney v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
” At XPertHR, David Weisenfeld covers Monday’s decision in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Just yesterday, a Ninth Circuit panel rejected this argument in Bowers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Paul Parsley, the former sheriff of Bullitt County, Kentucky, fired deputy sheriff David Greenwell immediately after he learned through a newspaper article that his deputy intended to run against him in the next election. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am by David Hart QC
Network Rail [2006] EWHC 1133 (QB) (Railtrack), or YL v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The TDS terms and conditions specifically state (7.10) that the deposit will remain protected where a statutory periodic tenancy follows a fixed term tenancy. [read post]