Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4661 - 4680 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm by Thomas Hopson
District Court for South Dakota and Judge David Hansen on the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Reese v Newman In a decision last month by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Reese v Newman, No. 14-CV-283 [D.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Debate in France is not about news content, but rather images, recounts Eleonora. * Stockholm District Court refuses to issue blocking injunction against access providerNedim's first post is about a recent decision of the Stockholm District Court, which rejected an application to issue an injunction against a Swedish internet access provider to block access to torrent sites The Pirate Bay and Swefilmer. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am by SHG
  The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Penney, 569 So. 2d 1335 (Fla 1st DCA 1990), the District Court, in reversing the workers’ compensation judge, seems to have taken judicial notice, without medical testimony, that a particular hazard was greater than that to which the general public is exposed. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 8:20 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed, taking the verdict away from the surviving wife and children. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Amicus Brief of First Amendment Legal Scholars Amici explain why First Amendment standing doctrine is uniquely permissive, and they argue that the district court erred in failing to conduct its standing analysis under the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by Blake Marcus
The United States Supreme Court has upheld DWI roadblocks as constitutional, but certain procedures must be followed by law enforcement. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by Michael Risch
An important implication of this effect is that the PTAB should use a claim construction standard that mirrors that of the district court, so that substituting administrative process for judicial process does not lead to substantively different outcomes. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:43 am by Lauren Vodopia
To date, the UCCJEA has been adopted by 49 states and the District of Columbia (except for Massachusetts) and various U.S. territories. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:24 am by Edwin Komen
Hurt Locker is also notable for a judicially rare, but highly instructive discussion of the Supreme Court’s publicity rights holding in the “Human Cannonball” case, Zacchini v. [read post]