Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Earle Partington was the civilian defense counsel in both the trial and appeal of the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
At the hearing, Laviolette stated that his conclusion that the mark on the road “look[ed] like a shoe scuff” was based on his training and experience. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin & Anor v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 989 (15 October 2007) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 968 (10 October 2007) Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970 (10 October 2007) Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (10 October 2007) Charman v Orion Group… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
In Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:35 am
Demon In'tl LC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
In Grade v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:29 am
See Matal v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
On this day in history, the Supreme Court ruled that the states are required to provide legal counsel to criminal defendants who are unable to pay for their own defense. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
:"Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical that trade mark which that advertiser has, without the consent of that proprietor, selected in connection with an internet referencing service, goods or… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
” (Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
Mark has some ideas about that.* Of Mice and Men: Regeneron v KymabAs David's post on Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) clearly shows, mice have a very special relation with patent case law. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:26 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
It also clearly re-states that knowledge of a third party’s prior use of the sign alone would not establish bad faith; rather, bad faith requires a clear demonstration of a dishonest intent, such as seeking to unfairly undermine competitors' interests or obtain an exclusive right beyond the functions of a trade mark. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Arcona, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Commentary on Lockhart v. [read post]
