Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 13,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
When public domain works meet trade mark law: Norwegian Industrial Property Office applies EFTA Court’s judgment and dismisses applications to register Vigeland’s artworks as trademarksA few months ago, IPKat Eleonora Rosati reported on an interesting and important decision issued by the EFTA Court, this being the court with jurisdiction over EFTA states that are parties to the EEA Agreement: Case E-5/16 – appeal from the municipality of Oslo. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
The Enforcement Division will target individual hackers, as well as registered entities that fail to safeguard nonpublic information, and public companies that fail to disclose cyber-related risks. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
BREAKING NEWS: United States of America v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
In doing so the BGH rather restrictively applies the CJEU reasoning in its recent decision in Nintendo Co Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH (C-25/16) of 27 September 2017 [here], which was handed down in the context of registered community designs to trade marks. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm
Department of Revenue and Quill v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The detectives later confirmed that the room was registered to both of them. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The detectives later confirmed that the room was registered to both of them. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 4:32 am
In Estate of Sample v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:02 am
Given that the ONS re-classification as public was put before Davis J in R(Macleod) v Peabody and did not stop that judge problematically (imho) categorising the act there concerned (a transfer) as private, I doubt very much that the re-re-classification as private will be of any real significance. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:06 am
OmniGen Research, LLC v. [read post]
